Czytam i drapię się w łeb z takim oto pytaniem: Po co były te wszystkie środki, skoro przez maziaje i inne edycyjne szaleństwa zdjęcie w tak dużym stopniu straciło cechy fotografii jako takiej?
2017-12-08 15:47:03
stoyog
I always list my equipment and lighting technique, as that?s the way I have learned ? by observing the work of people who actually share those insights. You are as entitled to express your opinion as I am to editing the photo the way I want, which is not necessarily a look that everyone may like:)
I am not criticizing your equipment list and it's good you show it for us to learn about studio gear. I just intended to say that, to me, the amount of digital effects is overwhelming relative to the sheer merits of the lighting technique applied.
The scars added in postprocess seem too prominent to me.
2017-12-08 17:04:33
stoyog
The only post processing done is colour toning and adding a layer to create an old glass effect; the rest is light and optics. This image is part of a series which I will publish in the next week or so. The others have minimal editing, I hope you enjoy them.
octa softbox 95?m back/right godox v860 1/1
godox v860 snoot 1/16 down/left
triggers 2 ? yongnuo 622c + 1 ? 622c-tx"
Czytam i drapię się w łeb z takim oto pytaniem: Po co były te wszystkie środki, skoro przez maziaje i inne edycyjne szaleństwa zdjęcie w tak dużym stopniu straciło cechy fotografii jako takiej?
The scars added in postprocess seem too prominent to me.